SuperAngel.Fund😇 | Investor #1 & Founding Advisor @quip🦷 @Caraway🏠 @Arber🪴 | Consumer (CPG, eComm SaaS), PropTech & Future of Work | ben@superangel.vc
Most first-time founders make the same rookie mistake when fundraising: They bury their potential investors in a mountain of details. It's like that quote: “I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.” — Mark Twain These entrepreneurs naively assume that the more information they share, the stronger their case for an investment. But, this usually ends up biting them in the ass. I’ll be the first to admit that I’ve been guilty of this, too — I’ve bombarded investors with data and information to prove to them that my company was a winner. I needed to convince them that I was right. It took me a long time to finally learn my lesson, but I eventually came to the realization that founders should operate with the underlying assumption that everyone is lazy. It’s easy to forget that most investors are bombarded with dozens of emails and pitches every single day. When investors are overloaded with information, they usually decide to skim over the email. And, when they do this, they’re more likely to miss the details most important to your pitch… and that’s assuming they read your email at all. When pitching potential investors for the first time, it’s important that you: 1. Only include the MOST important information 2. Get to the ask as quickly as possible Remember: Less is more. A few other useful tactics for any email pitch: - The email should be 2-5 sentences, 125 words. No more than 200. - Include your pitch deck (A PDF file. not Google Slides, not PowerPoint, not Docsend) - Link to your prototype or even better, a working product. CPG founders should link to their brand deck and visual renderings. - Demonstrate knowledge of the firm and why your company fits its thesis - Make a specific ‘Ask’ (phone call, opportunity to pitch in person, etc.) Like I said, everyone is lazy. The easier you make it for your potential investor to say “yes”, the more likely they are to do so.
With the exception of docsend, absolutely agreed.
Ben Zises Agree to most of it but Docsend is the norm today and it help founders with follow ups.
Ben Zises's insights ring true. A concise pitch that highlights the essence of your venture is paramount. As a digital strategist, I've seen the clutter of over information hinder many promising pitches. A clear, focused message aligns with busy investors' needs, enhancing the chance of engagement.
Ben Zises My understanding (which can always be wrong) is that the mark twain quote is a slight rephrase of French philosopher Blaise Pascal from several centuries earlier. 😎😎🙏🙏
There’s in inverse relationship between the more a company does and the size of a pitch deck. I too have learned this the hard way!
Co-founder, CEO at Circles | Startups & VC
3moGreat post…A potential concern with sending a PDF is not knowing how seriously to take investors' feedback without understanding the actual time they spent reviewing the opportunity. If your deck was only viewed for 10 seconds, everything the investor says may not carry the same weight. With DocSend you would know that…as a PDF you don’t.